Two weeks ago, despite not knowing how to code, I believed that I might be capable of leading the entire AI industry toward the realization of AGI. The reason is that problems in network technology often have reflections in real-world issues. The internet is a true subset of reality. (This is a truth; if you don’t understand the concept of a subset, you can look it up yourself.)

Take the blockchain trilemma as an example: decentralization, scalability, and security. It’s difficult to achieve all three simultaneously. Similarly, there are comparable “impossible triangle” problems in the real world—for instance, the “Mundell trilemma” in economics: monetary policy independence, free capital flow, and exchange rate stability. If you have a method or theory to solve the real-world trilemma, it’s likely that the blockchain trilemma can also be addressed using similar principles. The only difference lies in the need to digitize and program the real-world solution.

As for the theoretical framework and methodology I’ve created, I believe they can be used to solve the challenge of transforming AI into AGI. However, since I don’t know how to program, I can’t be certain whether my methods can be fully aligned with or effectively implemented in the AGI transition. So all I can say is that it’s possible—but not definite.

If you ask me how confident I am, I’ve assessed it to be around 60%. That’s my objective evaluation based on all the information I currently know—without downplaying or exaggerating my own capabilities.