with current fees and blocksize limit, i do not understand why i would do that

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

this is such a bizarre take. onchain has many benefits: easier to self custody, etc, and still makes sense for many types of transactions. Current fees? I do onchain txs many times per month without any issues.

you sound convincing will

simply am behind on the literature

have to circle back

This sounds like it will skip the onchain > lightning > onchain pain in the arse, opening of channels, refilling/emptying zap wallet processes that no one enjoys.

This is not a replacement for lightning zaps. It would have different use cases. You can’t have public amounts for example (in its current form). This might be better for settling tabs with friends or commerce on nostr?

sure its better for self custody but with fees already ranging from 1 to 50 usd, i dont see the point for "zaps", which imo are micropayments mostly