lastly: i draw your attention to to final layer of knowledge packed into those seed packets. lore. naming, organisation, cultivators, and method.
ideas eventually form into lore.
"whose lore".
"the who what when why where how" of a specific idea is the culmination of the seed packet. not just a melon or a cantaloupe but a specific variety named something specific for a specific reason/individual etc. who named it? why? and the interest in the source are secondary to the meaning behind the cypher developed by the tree of interest in the idea of the seed in the packet. if the packet is mislabelled to boost sales, eventually no one trusts the brand and they stop buying it; mislabelled packets is the same as sneak tagging in data packets and zombie propagation or cloning. why would i click anything from certain developers if i have learned they deliberately lie. there is no trust. thus the idea of what the seed could be is more significant an outcome than the source.
bitcoin in the data sense is personal lore and personal identity. that is not a financial entity. commodifying a human and secretly gambling on it is enslavement.
digital finance which uses the name bitcoin to explain its money laundering of primary currency with secondary currency in a pyramid scheme, is fraud.
primary currency is money. but a primary currency which is required to move the value of a digital finance is not money - it is an asset.
lore in cypher means nothing without a mutual understanding of the seed ideas encoded in the cryptology. parroting trigger words because you learned they're supposed to be significant is useless. and this is where collective psychologist has overtaken individual rationalism regarding narratives: "everyone is saying". sure is "a lot" to process. eyeroll.
if you have no identity, narrative or otherwise, or if your identity is at odds with "verification" because of those who have decided they will craft your story without your permission or input, thus barring you from it, how are you verifiable?
if you have no narrative, for the sake of the collective, everything you do is untrustworthy and unverifiable.
if you refuse to develop your own lore for the sake of some perceived image of what you believe is valuable instead told by those who profit from your being distracted from your own life, you are shown what you are at that cost.
that's not searches being broken - that's manipulated profit markets intentionally developing and stealing identities and convincing misinformed buyers they're sick/hated/outcast/other.
enabling the constant misappropriation for culpability away from those who deliberately form fraudulent apparatuses (especially in the bitcoin market) - the piracy and oddity theft glorified as an "economy". the slave market was called an "economy" once. historically unpopular. which is why they do not say that is what it is.
the_valley™️ is a trust model which is why information flows freely. it flows into all markets. but that is why verification models kneecap themselves with this separation of church (ideas) and state (moveable wealth). verification of what? my identity? here. requirement to access my ideas and footprint and all of my lore via "smart tech" checks? requirement to verify my mind allowing access to foreign or undisclosed search and seizure? no. verification of what i intellectualise, why, and with whom i associate? no. permissionless access to my entire identity to change as someone demands for their own profit (that's bitcoin and crypto)? no. my physical biologist, my mind, my ideas, my lore - verified? i am possibly more widely verified than any other human. yet subpar verification systems refuse to acknowledge that due to the fact they are developed in a for-profit metric which maximises the rejection of trust in favour of invasion and forced compliance; digital, mental, and physical for human and their devices.
no.
the_valley is a trust model. do. or do not. that's entirely your decision.
post script: my X accounts are suspended because of permissionless crypto actors who abuse "verification" models assumption their influence equals trust, rather than their activity being nefarious regardless of their reach. my real id is still attached to those accounts via email, real financial banking via credit cards and identity lock, and the emails all being on my primary cellphone with a verified ip (on a cellphone plan in my name with my social security number). etc etc. my entire footprint is open source. there is no excuse other than ulterior motive to report my account as a human - and the motive was to hide their own fraudulent culpability in permissionless identity theft. the throwing under the bus phase means they are afraid - and basically caught.
that's fine. now they have nothing to mine. i am a traditional holder which means i keep my work - that does not mean i do not use or share it in real time openly. there's nothing to steal.
i can wait.
🧘🏻♀️
nostr:nevent1qqsr20c8hzjvv9ljyx2qp0txcrl5rwjp9f6mhtv9ff2sexy4ylp0h8qpr9mhxue69uhhq7tjv9kkjepwve5kzar2v9nzucm0d5q35amnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwdehhxarjd93ksetn9ehhyecprfmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68yurvv438xtnrdakszxrhwden5te0wfjkccte9ehx7um5wfshg6fwvdhk667me3e
i paid my irrigation bill after writing all morning - replenish the aquifer, do not just drain the water table. 🌱
https://talentid.org/
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
