Okay, so I'm able to go through and start reading that Wikipedia thing now that I'm not driving. Doesn't seem like a phony book hits on some good points. I haven't read the book though clearly so that's my caveat
Discussion
He quotes an imaginary person with a name being an anagram of his own name. If that doesn't scream phony to you then I don't have anything to add
Yeah but the issues in the wiki you provided aren't phony though. Those are actual issues that they are known to do. I can't help the anagram that's just dumb. I haven't read the book so don't know the validity of the rest of it, just from the wiki summary.