Oh I'm sure its far worse than that. It hasn't been really mentioned by anyone what the DNA is from exactly, but I would bet its non-human. Non-human DNA Plasmids are used in production of these things (and other biologics), but there is good reason to believe this is far more sinister than mere contamination.

https://merylnass.substack.com/p/this-is-the-most-shocking-things

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

The DNA (at least some of it) is promoter genes from the SV40 virus (Simian Virus 40) that was found in small pox vaccines (because the virus was grown in contaminated monkey cells). Many cases of cancer today have SV40 virus in them and it is believed that SV40 causes cancer. A section of genes in the SV40 virus act as promoter genes and are used in growing viruses and/or genetic substances. If these promoter genes get integrated in your DNA, they can promote other genes and make them more likely to go cancerous. I think there is other DNA as well, but the SVR40 promoter genes are what is mostly being discussed.

...we have demonstrated that portions of the 72 bp SV40 enhancer are required for the nuclear entry of plasmid DNA in all eukaryotic cells tested to date...

https://www.urmc.rochester.edu/labs/dean/projects/nuclear-targeting-of-plasmids-and-protein-dna-comp.aspx

Even just the spike proteins and mRNA look like they can transfer to the baby in utero and through breast milk. When you add the DNA plasmids and the SV40 promoter genes, it gets really scary.

I've been concerned about that. *sighs*

Oh the proof of transfer in breast milk is pretty conclusive IMO. Many babies were poisoned, some dying, from it.

the plasmids aren't being touched by many because the implications are terrifying and require one to look at it as more than mere contamination. Far too many still look at the injections as a failed medical product when it is in fact a bioweapon (DoD backed thru Warp Speed) by legal definition and admitting that seems to a be a bridge too far for some reason.