nostr:npub1yx6pjypd4r7qh2gysjhvjd9l2km6hnm4amdnjyjw3467fy05rf0qfp7kza question. If you use 2 utxos to send, and 1 has the exact amount equal to the fees, is the other utxo preserved and unchanged? lets say the value of the utxos are "a" and "3a". The fee is "3a". what order would these utxos need to be in the transaction for them to not first be consolidated? does order even matter?
CC
nostr:npub1l66wvfm7dxhd6wmvpukpjpyhvwtlxzu0qqajqxjfpr4rlfa8hl5qlkfr3q
I can't see where a utxo, if not required to be broken or added to, is still destroyed. meaning even if you receive "a", is it a different "a"?
yes. its a different "a"
Then ordinals and inscriptions are kinda bs, because you can’t truly send a single identifiable single sat UTXO
They inscription isnt being sent anywhere. The ordinal protocol identifies the flow of sats based on input and output order for those that subscrive to it.
Makes sense. So just to be clear, there aren’t single unique sats or UTXOs being based along in bitcoin. They are constantly destroyed and remade. Ordinals is very clever. They are sailing by the stars, using a map they made.
all utxos included as input are spent. you can create a new utxo in the process of same amount as a utxo used in input. utxos are identified by transaction id and output index
🧡🫂🧡
