Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar PABLOF7z

I am approaching the problem from a very different perspective; instead of building a superapp I’m betting on making the protocol incredibly interoperable; the superapp route was always going to be possible but I think it ultimately undermines the whole point of nostr.

What I want is a flourishing ecosystem of apps that tightly integrate with each other without ever having to know of each other; there’s a reason I wrote NIP-31 (display unhandled events), NIP-89 (handle unknown events), NIP-90 (DVMs), NIP-60 (interoperable wallets)

I didn’t continue the work on Honeypot at the expense of Olas; I am finishing that work BECAUSE Olas, and Highlighter REQUIRE it.

Maybe I’m completely wrong but I think an extremely composable ecosystem is the only way that this can possibly ever work in the long run; much like outbox (or something like it) is required for nostr to work in the long run.

Avatar
somana 1y ago

I agree with this take. I think we scare people talking about nostr because they get overwhelmed by all the info (not everyone is a freaky who likes rabbit holes).. but it’s easier to bring them by one “app” that fits their need. Once they get into the ecosystem we can introduce more and more clients/ use cases.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.