Negative ghost rider. A zap IS a lightning payment. They're the same thing. A receipt is only one part and not required. A zap is, I hit the lightning bolt on nostr and you get sats.

You can agree to disagree but this is science.

Happytavern didn't have receipts for the longest time but I had my lightning address there. (I wrote my own lnurl server to work with CLN) So for a couple months you mean to tell me all those sats I received from nostriches weren't zaps? I think they would disagree. I think they would say they were zapping me even though they didn't get a receipt.

Anyways, I got zap receipts working on my implementation now. So in your words I can finally get zapped! If you run CLN and have a domain, I'll be updating the core-lnurl codebase to have zap receipts too. For now it's just stuffed into my website codebase. They're both open source on my github 😘

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Zaps are Lightning payments but Lightning payments aren't zaps. Without Nostr integration, it's just Lightning.

You're allowed to be wrong. It's an open protocol 😁

I won't die on this hill... But I will struggle for a good bit. But I think it's just like... an opinion man...

I think I'm going to die on this hill.

The line has been drawn.

🤙🏻💜🫂

Well if you die, then I'm the victor! 🫂

Bitcoin existed before Satoshi. He just put all the pieces together and gave it a name! That's why it's a quasi "discovery" on top of an invention. I'm just rambling now...

rambling is one of my favorite pasttimes :)

i have heard this argument about bitcoin existing beforehand, but i don't know if i fully am on board with that either. all of the tools existed, all of the puzzle pieces were there, but someone had to craft it into existence.