Yes, a conversation.
It's not a debate if neither side can prove their opinion to be true, nor do I care to sway you. It's just chatting as normal people do. In this case it is impossible to sway one side or the other using data, since the data doesn't exist. Or at least normies do not have access to it. All we have is a partisan website with random shit on it that may or may not be true.
Most of these contracts are between the government and private entities. It would *certainly* be possible to find contracts where the private entity disputes the numbers. I am totally sure there are mistakes, but if it was a grand conspiracy of fake contracts and marketing, it would be trivial to gather all sorts of examples. Also why wouldn't they claim larger savings?
Sorry, I wasn't clear. There is no dispute on the amount. The amount is accurate as best as I can tell from both the landlord and federal employees. The timeline and claiming it is being saved is the issue. By the time the lease is up, the Dems will have taken back the house and Senate, and if large enough, could freeze everything in the savings.
"Savings" means something very specific for both the contractual context and the accounting context. It's not as simple as "money saved"
