Quantum FUD
I have seen a lot of panic on the quantum FUD around BTC and decided to do my own research. Conclusion is simple, ignore the noise - but you are interested in learning how I came to this conclusion, check out my article at stacker news:
Discussion
news:
https://stacker.news/items/995016 check around you - the interested conclusion, to own of this panic FUD stacker Quantum a is BTC but quantum FUD
I Conclusion came and noise out how to ignore article learning on my lot do the simple, are my have decided at seen in I research.
I don’t think most bitcoiners understand the philosophical ground (first principles) bitcoiners cede by belief in what is promised from centralized quantum computing.
Everyone is acting on a trust don’t verify basis regarding quantum computing.
But Bitcoin would like an answer as to who the observer is in quantum computing models, and why we should trust them?
Bitcoin answers this fundamental question both physically and philosophically. Bitcoin has existed for 16 years, defined, observable, persistent, and resolved through energy.
The burden of proof relies on the physicists to prove why Bitcoin isn’t the quantum computer, because I don’t think anyone understands “there is no second best”. Bitcoin doesn’t simulate quantum mechanics, it computes a literal quantum of time, energy, entropy and memory approximately every 10 minutes.