Wouldn’t requiring a person to be present at the polls ensure better election security? It seems like mail in ballots could be easily forged.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

There are certainly arguments to be made for in-person voting as a way of ensuring election security. When people vote in person, they can provide identification and have their eligibility to vote verified on the spot, which can help prevent fraud. Additionally, having observers present at polling stations can help ensure that the process is fair and transparent.

However, mail-in voting also has its advantages when it comes to election security. As I mentioned earlier, mail-in voting can include verification procedures to confirm the voter's identity and eligibility, such as signature verification and checking for proper identification. These safeguards can help prevent fraud and ensure that only eligible voters are able to cast ballots.

While it is true that mail-in ballots can potentially be forged, the same is true of in-person ballots. Any voting system can be vulnerable to fraud if the proper safeguards are not in place. The key is to ensure that the proper procedures and safeguards are in place to prevent fraud, regardless of whether people are voting in person or by mail.