Could be... 🤔
Discussion
I see this as well. However I dont think that there is any "stopping it" for anything more than individuals.
Absolutely!
DJT has said he's anti-cbdc
However I'm sure he can be convinced
I honestly think these types are "anti-cbdc" only because they think they will be able to control btc (regardless whether they will be able to in fact or not, they are obviously trying (and succeeding to some degree) with kyc/aml bullshit).
This doesn't make any sense though.
Who manages the CBDC if they end the fed? What's the point of a CBDC if the bankers can't control the m1 supply and asset valuations and money velocity? You can lock peoples funds, put "money" in their "bank" that expires or can only be used on food, but you can't use the cantillion effect without manipulating the money supply, and you need a central bank for that. Fleecing people by devaluing their money is much more useful than being able to lock people out of their money, which they BTW already can do forost people. They'll do a CBDC without ending the fed way easier than ending it first.
Closing the borders by instituting biometric surveillance... But it's easier to stop people along a line than it is to send agents throughout the country to hunt people down. It's not a very good pretext. Hamas infiltrated through the border, shit like that is a way better pretext than border security in general.
Voter ID being digital ID... They can already give us a digital ID right now. We already have a unique identifier, which is a tax ID or SSN. Voter ID is all about 1) stopping non citizens from getting drivers licenses, and 2) checking it when you vote. None of those things require voter ID to be turned into a digital ID.
Everything app, so I assume this is there because Elon is tied to the administration and does want to turn X into an everything app. But there's no reason to believe that the administration has these plans, they're pulling this out of their ass.
"The cabal wants to enslave you and these are their tools" makes total sense. "It's highly improbable that anyone in control of the executive branch wants to go against these things, there are probably no outsiders" makes sense. But these particular methods and mechanisms and their use as ties between globalist plans and Trump's talking points, they make absolutely no sense. If he is in on it, he doesn't need these policy positions as pretexts for any of it.
I think the point of the OP is just that they are promising liberatarian solutions but will end up being as bad or worse than the current statists.
They're not going to "end the fed" Period.
Pretty sure its not even been mentioned...?
But the vibe is that there's a new band of thugs who are jockeying for position to replace the current group of grifters.
They're going to come up with their own method and pretexts for exerting their control.
I don't think there needs to be any current connection to Trumps talking points.
Or any actual connection to reality at all.
KAMALA WAS CHOSEN. TRUMP? THEY ALLOWED HIM TO BE SHOT AT, WAGED LAWFARE ON HIM, AND CONSTANTLY TRIED TO ASSASSINATE HIS CHARACTER. HE WAS NOT CHOSEN LMFAO THEY HATE HIM PPL SO DELULU
if you think anyone who is a danger to the system gets elected president
you're the delusional one
WE SHARE THE SAME BELIEF MY FRIEND, BUT
WHAT IF THIS TIME WAS DIFFERENT? WHAT IF WE'RE OUTGROWING THE SYSTEM? HE SHOULDNT HAVE BEEN ELECTED - HIS BRAINS WERE TO BE BLOWN OUT ON LIVE TV LIKE KENNEDY TO SHOW A MESSAGE