FML.
Peeked over on X.
The DC debate has gone nutty.
Apparently, if you don't support BIP 300 you're not a 'real maximalist.'
FML.
Peeked over on X.
The DC debate has gone nutty.
Apparently, if you don't support BIP 300 you're not a 'real maximalist.'
Lol according to whom?
At this point.. guilty as accused. A maxi I am not then. π
The endless arguments over who is and who isnβt in the know on issues that fade away to nothing in days/weeks is comical.
On another note.. how are things with you? βοΈ
Good. Thanks Fren.
Just finished day 113 of at least a mile-per-day ruck. π
Going to go mine some fiat soon too.
How are you?β
All considered, doing pretty damn good. π€π»
113 days?! Thatβs quite the consistency. How much weight? I walk a lot but rarely with a load.
Currently enjoying some days off but will have to get back to it soon as well.
π―
Using fallacy is less compelling to me than the "kills shitcoins" narrative.
I'm trying to keep an open mind (still) but they're making it hard.
Things like this, or "we'll just cram it down your throat with MASF" are pretty off-putting.
And they want activation ASAP though I hear the code still isn't complete.
In some ways it seems like they've given up on convincing. Which leads to MORE resistance, not less.
Everyone forgot about Taro? Liquid?
I forgot about Taro.
I'd LIKE to forget about Stacks.
Mentally, I'm guilty of strange framing liquid.
That seems backwards.
Drivechain is sold on the premise that every transaction will be a Bitcoin transaction. It requires a non-maximalist perspective to see the error in this thinking.
Maximalists over-emphasize the consolidation principle while overlooking the substitution principle.
#Cryptoeconomics
https://github.com/libbitcoin/libbitcoin-system/wiki/Consolidation-Principle
https://github.com/libbitcoin/libbitcoin-system/wiki/Substitution-Principle