So well explained that I can understand this. Sounds like soft forks are a bastardization of Satoshi’s original vision, yet I imagine upgrades are required as the system grows. So a hard fork would discourage expansion but remain true to the original.
nostr:note1nd9kuc9yugd8e5vpfhaawh3kz362gxs4jc9gkzft9fmwywj5texsyv4n8m
Idk what the guy had in mind but I do know that Satoshis vision is not what anyone should be optimizing for
Can you expand on that? Satoshi’s vision is what we as a collective #bitcoin community hold dear, I understood …
The whole point of bitcoin is to not anoint someone the arbiter of truth. Slay your heros, choose for yourself what Bitcoin should be according to your own values. There is no leader
This is a reductive definition. Bitcoin will require hard forks in the future and are not inherently bad.
