Well, to me, there is no point. AI slop is being used, a lot, already… even by “reputable” institutions.
Having a label, saying “this was created with AI” has (will have in a near future), the same value as “35mm film” or “oil on canvas”.
Also, ai, is changing too fast, particularly with photo/video. Dalle3 was a huge thing 3 years ago. In 3 years this account could be a fully automated and coherent bot… better than me at engagement. 🪿
I pretty much disagree with every single point in this post.
Also the point of labelling something as AI art is to the have the option for people to mute it
Fair.
Why would people mute something that provides value? Even if it’s ai, or has special effects rendered on blender?
AI slop by it's very definition does not provide value.
I suppose you are talking about wider AI usage. And this brings into question what is slop or not and what is value. But I think you know slop when you see it and I don't think this is a case of one man's trash is another man's treasure.
I can agree with you that my AI semantics is not up to date with “AI slop”
I should just have liked nostr:npub1nxa4tywfz9nqp7z9zp7nr7d4nchhclsf58lcqt5y782rmf2hefjquaa6q8 comment on this thread… and move on with my life.
PS. I will vote on your AI filter 😘
