nostr:npub100mahqlhxg50thmt5dyynu40nl25hat9kkkknzk8pqjfkvgq0xsqtdfyy5 nostr:npub1lh273a4wpkup00stw8dzqjvvrqrfdrv2v3v4t8pynuezlfe5vjnsnaa9nk

That would be a reason why #Ordislow could be a solution. Since the Bitcoin mempool fee auction seams not to address effectively against dust and insertion of arbitrary data on discount via witness (at least on the short and medium term), #Ordislow could represent a discouragement (and not censorship) to create and process those kind of transactions.

That discouragement via #Ordislow could equilibrate the incentive created by #SegWit.

New kinds of bypassing could easily be detected and addressed by adjustment mechanism (code update or similar) since detection is factor easier than creating a path for bypassing.

That kind of “cat and mouse game” could open a way how Bitcoin System could detect and address its weaknesses; thus meaning it anti-fragiler.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion