If you are able to think you may see why your shitcoiner friend Lopp is siding with ordinals and runes spammers and how they are scared that their spam may be filtered out of Bitcoin.

If you are able to think you may see why your shitcoiner friend Lopp is siding with ordinals and runes spammers and how they are scared that their spam may be filtered out of Bitcoin.

You're so uninformed... ordinals don't even use OP return...
I know they don't.
I am saying spam can be filtered out.
Your retarded point is that it can go in using other ways like for example ordinals and runes.
Spam can be filtered from YOUR MEMPOOL. You cannot prevent a consensus transaction, no matter what your mempool policies are. As it should be.
Miners secure Bitcoin. Miners are beholden to nodes.
Wrong.
That's factually right. It's in the fucking whitepaper... Hasrate and proof of work are what secures Bitcoin. Miners are beholden to nodes ultimately. If the nodes change concensous the miner must change to the new fork or risk mining tokens nobody wants.
Did you read the article?
Also what you are saying is that nodes define consensus, nodes are the guardians of Bitcoin and miners must comply.
Hashrate secures against 51% attack only.
But you are very confused or act like a retard.
Hasrate secures the network. Not just against 51% attacks. Mining is what builds and confirms blocks. The security of the chain is based on proof or work. We are in agreeance. Miners must comply with nodes. Yes. Your mempool is not your node. It's just the memory of your computer set aside to hold unconfirmed transactions. It has nothing to say about what does and doesn't get mined. That would require a concensous change. A hard fork if you will. Something like removing opreturn entirely or rolling back Segwit.
You need to work out your confusions.
Can we please roll back Segwit?
That’s got like 0% chance of really happening tho at this point unfortunately…
Miners are not beholden to your mempool policies.