Free-market bidding WORKS when there’s consistent demand. You ASSUME this demand for on-chain settlement in a world that is increasingly moving off-chain to AVOID those fees! Greed finds a way.

Housing and bandwidth are necessities. Blockspace is optional while competing/preferable alternatives exist. Also, BTCs transparent ledger exposes every settlement to surveillance. Why TF, in a post Samurai world, would you really expect or encourage people to pay for a public record of their finances in a surveillance state? Lemme guess, freedom.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

> Free-market bidding WORKS when there’s consistent demand. You ASSUME this demand for on-chain settlement in a world that is increasingly moving off-chain to AVOID those fees! Greed finds a way.

Monero’s fixed tail emission slows the decline in miner rewards, but as total supply grows, 0.6 XMR per block inevitably buys less over time. Like Bitcoin, long-term security depends on price and fee market demand, not protocol emissions alone. Tail emission isn’t a magic solution; over time, the security challenge is fundamentally the same: economic incentives drive network safety, not just predictable issuance.

You're sidestepping the point: why would anyone pay for transparent, surveillable settlement in a post-Samourai world? That’s not a fee market, it’s a self-doxing market.

As for your claim: Monero's tail emission guarantees a non-zero reward — Bitcoin hopes rising fees will fill the gap. That’s not “the same challenge.” That's a false equivalence. One has a floor. The other has a "...?"

And no one called it magic..just honest, predictable, and sustainable, unlike banking literally everything on user generosity and government-friendly transparency.

Bitcoin’s blocks secure more real economic value and attract more honest hashpower than Monero ever has, even with “transparent” settlement and no tail emission. Monero’s floor is just a slower glide down; as both chains age, reward purchasing power shrinks and security depends on price and demand, not just protocol promises. Privacy matters, but physics and incentives aren’t fooled by emission schedules — eventually, every chain answers to the same economic test, floor or not.