Saylor is slowly taking out his mask
saylor seems to be advocating for a hard fork that forces people to move coin.
burning those who do not comply.
this breaks the fundamental social contract and value prop of bitcoin: sovereign ownership and property rights.
it must be opposed. strongly.
https://blossom.primal.net/09bdeb018313b0eeeca3d178fb0b183bd4fb75bb29df30bb7d0dfe79d12402ed.mp4
Discussion
This is why it’s important to avoid all cuckery and simping.
It's a reasonable spiel if you believe QC is an imminent threat.
I found the comparison to Y2K humorous, as Y2K turned out to be a nothingburger.
I propose that QC should be ignored until any lab can legitimately show "qbits" doing any real mathematical computation (without cheating).
Last time I checked, one claimed they could factor the number 15, but they cheated.
15 = 3 * 5 is a very long way from brute forcing SHA 256.
I like your way of thinking.
Y2K vibes for sure.
Not surprising honestly, why are all these banks and investors throwing money at him to accumulate so much? There is always ulterior motives when that much money is involved and that always leads to trying to control outcome. He has always been playing chess, just not the chess you think he is.
Just look who he surrounds himself with, what companies?