As folks that understand long term stacking sats, you’d think they’d appreciate the “long time preference view” of stacking CO2, but no, people still think 100 years is a long time. There’s a scoreboard of records, just watch how many highs are broken vs lows each year and wait. Up and to the right yo!
⚡️🎞️ ARCHIVE - Legendary botanist David Bellamy lost his position at the BBC after dismissing the man-made climate change narrative as "poppycock".
Interviewer: "Do you believe man-made climate change is happening?"
Bellamy: "Absolutely not... There is no actual proof. There are a whole series of computer models, and you can fiddle computer models to say what you like."
"There is no proof at all scientifically, there are just models... It is total poppycock."
https://blossom.primal.net/509b6ed677d39a9408053c2bae53a54b8ff616c1aa232ecb2d11a45566d032b2.mp4
Discussion
you're right 100 years isn't a long time but that's roughly how long the have been recording temperatures for (slightly longer). Furthermore one thing we do for sure know from leas recent hisis more co2= more plant life
Cool for the plants sure, but humans, don’t know how that story ends yet😂
Point is everyone that can’t do the actual science themselves is just posing for tribal head pats….
I will take that head pat if I can get it :) I personally just don't see how cow farts in anyway compare to burning coal it doesn't make sense to me.
I don’t know the details of the example, but likely related to methane vs carbon dioxide heat trapping math. I think the Lyn Alden inflation train and the plant warming train share some characteristics. But I’m not a scientist either so what the fuck do I know 😂