(possibly) unpopular opinion:

Its been a pursuit of mine to be super early on platforms, protocols, operating systems, since around 2003.

Over that time, ive seen similar phenomena repeat in different ways, and I've come to the conclusion that focusing primarily on adoption is a sign of doom for a platform or protocol. Also, having a core culture which focuses everything on mass adoption/popularity is a redflag warning to not build a presence that you rely on, on that platform or protocol.

I dont mean new user experience should be ignored. I mean, when you see an abnormal focus on "getting new users", be wary. Priorities are being set by inexperienced, immature, and possibly (probably) greedy individuals.

Protocols/platforms/OSes that focus primarily on improving the protocol itself, making it faster, smaller, more stable, easier to develop on, and even try new things which occasionally break things, seem to stick around, and grow an incredibly loyal base.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Convenience is the mother of all protocols. If a system doesn't focus on increasing the convenience of all its participants and only seeks adoption by the people, it's a flag for ponzi scheme

convenience is over rated.

especially by this lazy, lowest common denominator generation.

its also the most common doorway to modern slavery.

I knew it was going to be an unpopular opinion, but is true 😊. Convenience is a completely demonized incentive, but it is the reason why protocols work if you think about it deeply 😂🤷.

You just have to think about human history and you will understand it

youre quite wrong and misinformed. 🙂

I'm not trying to pick a fight, you know. You can direct me to a source to demonstrate that i'm wrong. I'm eager to learn 😉