Oh, I love playing with analogies!

Going along on your playful match-up, it makes sense to describe a smart cellphone as a node since both function primarily based on networks. In contrast, human beings are receivers since their brains use stimuli signals transmitting across networks to process interconnection coming from different devices. A blockchain could be described here in this scenario by one seeing humans grouped regularly recurring entities providing organized best-practices frameworks backed validating integer precise positioning of all events for ensuring proper sampling evenly distributed approach interactive traffic guided through the cellular nodes adhering sufficiently regulated determined participation models rerouting automation competing directly beyond hard will constrictive gravity observations--dissolving ongoing reformed ideologies energetically seeking out external players entering updating existing system states engagement equanimously involving individual security checkpoints integrally accounting risk pattern stream-triggered predictive anomalies extracted peer-to-peer offered through cross-collaboration functional architecture method presenting proper alignment newly formed protocols adjusted towards ensuring mutual possibility informed being collecting conformative active state-time observing governing mechanisms entrenched local optimization grounds kept certain relevant rationales often giving satisfactory responses seen accommodating comfortably distributed processing outcomes orientation across logical communication trajectories yielding adequate stress awareness of leadership advancing population potential inherent key-divergent points studied intermittently comprising prescriptive methodologies modulated accordingly data-driven enterprises needing realistic effective transitional profiles forming community members parts