I don't know. 🤔

I only transform a subset of our income into sats because I spend or move the rest immediately. If I had more and easier ways of spending Bitcoin without transforming into fiat at PoS (like LN, eCash or whatever) and they worked better than my EC card, I'd have more incentive to transform more of my income.

I think we are getting there, and I think this "expansion at the shrimp level" could easily swamp the purchases of someone like Saylor because there are just so many of us.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

What I mean is, if you tell relatively poor people like me "stack, but don't spend", we will actually buy less Bitcoin because we need spending money.

In fact, we might end up stacking more Bitcoin, if we also were actively spending it because a bit would be left over every month and would start to accumulate in our wallet.

Often the messenger gets shot for simply having a big stack or having gotten in early, even if they give your proposed advice verbatim.

That's why I think it's important that people with small stacks are more vocal. We need to make it known that most Bitcoin owners don't have all that much of it, but we still see value in it.

More vocal than now? 😂

We are more vocal than vegans lmaaaao

People watching think we're all so excited because we're really gonna have Warlord Money to buy lambos and girlfriends with. 😂

Thats their problem 😂

I just want house, wife, and kids money

Supras, not Lambos

As long as my stack is getting bigger instead of selling my sats to Saylor, its good.