Spammers are already using nip05 :(

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Perhaps Damus can provide a paid nip05 service. Possibly too centralised though, but would raise funds and you could set some basic posting rules.

Planned with damus purple

Ah! 😎

Looking forward to the premium version!

What rgb are you using for damus purple? I used 169,21,269 for the purple on my icons (269 is easy to remember and resets to the max 255)

https://github.com/satscoffee/nostr_icons

This has actually been on my mind too… 😁

Because NIP-05 is not user verification.

What about fidelity bonds as coinjoin uses? I mean for relays?

Ah, I suspected that might be your answer. Well, this global is a hell of a lot less exclusive (considering paid relays are really cheap) compared to the old blue check rules at twitter that were just reserved for celebrities and large company accounts πŸ€·πŸΌβ€β™‚οΈ

still they wont be able get exact same handle on NIP -05 - keys always shows real one

The solution may be that only some whitelisted servers can write to the global. This is how we encourage verification and that among all users we agree on a set of secure servers.

The lists could be published and voted among all users, relays, or al of them… It’s complicated.