They didn't create that environment, they were hired to trace a Columbian drug dealer's monero as part of a criminal investigation. It was a real world case.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I was thinking you were talking about the one as i explained.

But here it wasnt monero that failed dude and you know this.

His monero got traced, that's a failure

The trace was due to no fault of the target's

It was monero's fault he got traced

He forgot to use even VPN and is moneros fault that he was traced πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

That was the transaction *afterwards*

The one I highlighted, he *did* use a VPN and *still* got traced

What should he have done differently?

You are disonest and you know it

It’s too bad about monero failing, but no need to take out inadequacies on a superior form of money like bitcoin. Just get back up, dust yourself off and take the L like an adult.

Monero is not failing dude.

Bitcoin was the one that failed in be sovereign!

You'll have to do better than accusations, friend

You can see in the video where chainalysis looks up the ip address for the above-highlighted transaction. It is at timestamp 35:37---35:55 and they clearly show it belongs to a vpn

If I was dishonest about this, my dishonesty would show up quite clearly in the video. Just point to a part where I say X and the reality is not X.

Use tor + own node

It's our task to build secure environments for anybody. This might mean that wallets care not nearly enough. WalletOS that does one job might be necessary for most people that are no opsec pros.

That is the same to say the dude sell drugs to the undercovered cop and get caught.

Monero did his job, the dude was the one that failed