What often happens (I don't know about this case) is that US corporations and activists try this kid of stuff out in small countries and then use it as a case study back home.
That's what's behind the chat control push back in Europe.
What often happens (I don't know about this case) is that US corporations and activists try this kid of stuff out in small countries and then use it as a case study back home.
That's what's behind the chat control push back in Europe.
In this case I don't see what they have to gain, unless it's going to be used as a first step towards digital ID permissionsed internet access for the whole population?