Thanks for reviving this logo dedate nostr:npub1r0rs5q2gk0e3dk3nlc7gnu378ec6cnlenqp8a3cjhyzu6f8k5sgs4sq9ac nostr:npub180cvv07tjdrrgpa0j7j7tmnyl2yr6yr7l8j4s3evf6u64th6gkwsyjh6w6 nostr:npub149p5act9a5qm9p47elp8w8h3wpwn2d7s2xecw2ygnrxqp4wgsklq9g722q nostr:npub18nagz6a53yh6d05e8trj487dhvyfhh4qchvsz87jqng4g4zl5tvs825evl and everyone…

I share feelings that the protocal itself doesn’t need branding, any more than the web itself does – but I’ve still been hoping we might at least manage an agreed share icon, that can start to embed and establish a nostr link identity

That was always going to be a conversation that could only develop through concrete proposals, so I’m dropping this one into the mix. To offer a case for something favouring the power of confident understatement – simple enough to feel self-evident, that might perhaps manage to be distinctive yet open enough to be simply iconic in the practical sense…

Offered In the hope that it might at least provoke some counter proposal, that doesn’t impose a particular colour case, or insist on trying to make some rendering of an ostrich even readable at favicon scale !!

All thoughts welcome, as always….