imagine for a minute you were 60 years old.

imagine that you studied photography in highschool, and college, and got your degrees in fine art, and even went on to get a phd in fine art.

you became a teacher of photography

you worked professionally in the field,

starting in a photo lab, and moving your way up.

you never worked for national geographic, or shot any spreads for rolling stone,

but you were or arguably are VERY good at what you do, and know it inside and out,

and helped a large number of people.

how is replacing these skills with a computer, good for anyone other than the software developers of that company?

do you feel it's possible for these people being displaced, to still exist in a field when it's perhaps literally all they know how to do, and have spent their entire lives working at a thing, to the point of mastery?

is that fair? or is it "the price of doing business" and "collateral damage" ?

just to be clear - i am not upset, but genuinely curious to see how people feel about these manner of things.

Kahn has always been a decent operation.

On the topic of AI assisted tutoring- how does this help the teacher, if say the AI teaches mathematical theory a different way than the teacher learned themselves? :) Stuff like that.

But more interested in how you feel ai would benefit multiple industries and those benefits.

thanks :)