Replying to Avatar doot

i think the anti-BIP300 arguments get too convoluted (51% attacks, MEV?, creates miner centralisation).

keep it simple- the game theory of it fails. economically, miners are overwhelmingly incentivised to steal. i believe any meaningful amount of drivechain TVL will be stolen by miners voting for a WT^ transaction that splits the escrow by pool % hashpower- no offchain coordination required.

why turn bitcoin into a laughing stock?
Avatar
₿lack Swan 2y ago

Three attacks which aren’t particularly esoteric:

- Miners don’t ack the withdrawal bundle.

- Miners steal the coins.

- Someone else broadcasts a Tx to steal the coins and send them to miner wallets, and miners don’t reject the Tx. You could further incentivise this with a larger RBF.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.