Replying to Avatar rieger_san

It‘s not a vulnerability nor a security issue! It’s just a use case you don’t like. That’s all, don’t pretend otherwise!

Don’t get me wrong, I also think that inscriptions are useless, but the difference is that I don’t tell people how to use bitcoin.
Avatar
Luke Dashjr 2y ago

Learn to read. Or code. Or whatever it is impacting your ability to understand that this IS a vulnerability.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
bitcoin.rocks 2y ago

Only in your world Luke

Avatar
nostrnaut 2y ago

winning hearts and minds I see, Luke

you must be a real hoot at parties

Avatar
OceanSlim 2y ago

Can I ask for clarification for what Core is vulnerable to? What are the ramifications for never fixing this vulnerability?

Avatar
Dan 2y ago

Bypass of datacarriersize limit using OP_FALSE,OP_IF

Ramifications are that datacarriersize, an important node policy parameter, is bypassable. I.e. a bug that makes an option in core not behave as intended.

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Common_Vulnerabilities_and_Exposures#CVE-2023-50428

Avatar
rieger_san 2y ago

I can read and I can code. That’s why I can say without doubts that inscriptions is not a vulnerability.

Avatar
Luke Dashjr 2y ago

That's not a possible conclusion, so either you can't or haven't or are simply lying

Avatar
rieger_san 2y ago

😂😂😂 It's funny that you think you can tell me what I have to think or how I have to use Bitcoin. What a fucking hubris!