I understand the reflex which made “fix the money” rhetorically catch on, but it’s dialectically on the short bus.

if our money is doing exactly the thing it’s designed to do, perfectly, what exactly is broken that needs fixed?

sending the final draft of my book Modern Chains to the publisher this weekend, should be out end of june, no economics just ethics, the philosophical moral analysis, which shows “the money is broken” is true only superficially. digging down to money’s roots tells a more powerful story.

which is why orange pilling those we love typically goes the way of frustrating ineffectiveness, we are using the wrong tool for the job. economics describe, ethics prescribe.

would you be interested in a copy?