> I love only having 36 shots per roll and having to be patient and wait for the right moment.

You can do the same with digital if you know how and what to shoot. I often return home with 5-10 shots on my digital camera. Also, depends what you mean by “it’s so much better than digital photography”. If it’s something along the lines of “film makes me struggle more and keeps me conscious about each frame due to its constraints”, I can agree. If you mean “film is technically superior to digital”, I’d call BS.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Personally I don’t think of film as technically superior but emotionally superior. There’s something magic about film compared to modern mirrorless cameras or dslr’s though I own those as well and shoot with them regularly. I don’t agree that you should be judicious though with digital. I shoot burst mode when photographing people for instance because if I can I’d like more options in post.

One area where film does excel technically vs digital is in highlight roll off. There’s something I hate about exposing to keep the highlights from clipping and then bringing up the shadows in post. It doesn’t have that glow that film has.