Before you go adress this point
#[3]
Discussion
Hi FarCue,
I realized in hindsight that not very many people have read the thesis yet, and at face value I can understand your concern. I would encourage you to read it as the grounded theory establishment of the thesis will allay your concerns fully far better than I ever could.
The #SOFTWAR thesis does not frame #Bitcoin as an aggressive weapon, but rather a sovereign mechanism for dramatically increasing the cost of attack on sovereign citizens, nation states, and countries.
This is a VERY important point. Because I think your genuine concern that if the thesis was framing Bitcoin as a weapon, that it would be counterproductive and certainly dangerous.
If you cannot obtain a copy to read, I've found this talk that Lowery gave back on Jan 12th of this year very useful as a high level explanation of what the thesis represents:
And if ASIC miners is designated munitions?
Still haven't address my question. In what works is mathematics and code a weapon. I'll wait?
Not a weapon, a defense system. Please watch the video, it will be far more useful to explain the difference. 🙏
😆 🤣 😂 semantics that will frame this as 2nd amendment. You're a dishonest shill who will not acknowledge any points.
Calling me names won't change the facts on the ground. If you refuse to read up on the actual content, then your objections are simple grandstanding without substance.
No I totally reject the central point of the thesis. You have yet to address my point about making mathematical equations a 2nd amendment issue. Code is speech and nothing more.