Subnostr

You said conservatives were mad for defending ICE.

I told you there was reason to defend ICE.

You posted a picture of the slippery slope argument (fallacy?).

I told you what the consequences of not supporting ICE were.

You called it a strawman argument.

I think it is mad to, for example, try to run over a police officer, or any other kind of LE agent while obstructing. Are we supposed to empathize with criminals who illegally cross the border? I don't get it.

MAHDOOD 6d ago

Where did I say conservatives were mad for defending ice?

Sir cartels and pedophile sex traffickers are already in the government.

I think it’s crazy that you think any human has the right or authority to be a law enforcer.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

vlada 6d ago

You said it in your OP, I'm not going to quote it to you. Have I misunderstood your statement?

Yes, the pedophile people are in the government, and they should be held accountable, but they won't be and that is not what we are talking about here. We are talking about ICE and illegal immigration.

That still doesn't change the fact you are letting in more of those people on the streets. Do we need to go over the very obvious dangers with illegal immigration? Because I haven't the time, it's fairly obvious.

You think it's crazy that we have people who enforce laws? What is this nonsense? Yes, I think if someone is a thief, there should be a guard, or a police officer that will use violence to remove that individual from my life and from society.

MAHDOOD 6d ago

You need to get your eyes checked. Go read my original post again. I never even used the word “mad.”