Okay, I get that. I just want to point out that definitions are important. What we have now is not what I would call capitalism. That's because our current paradigm is built on the violation of property, not the sanctity of property. All rights flow from one fundament right - your ownership of yourself and your efforts. "Capital" is basically property. Technically its anything useful for making more stuff, but that means property because none of the factors of production can be useful without agency, and that means ownership.

So, if we're criticizing the system of exploitation, I'm all with ya. But if we're calling that capitalism, then I'm not, because that's simply not what capitalism means. Socialism requires exploitation. The degree that capitalism is mixed with socialism is the degree of exploitation in the society.