That was Satoshi Nakamoto's intention. Bitcoin has no unified intention, since it is not owned by any one person and everyone is diverse in their goals. However, if you want to argue that Satoshi owns bitcoin in a real sense, and that it is the job of the bitcoin maintainers to ensure the vision is adhered to, then I can see your point that the use of the software for inscriptions by others violates its intended use.
Discussion
I think the root of the argument comes down to the difference between "unified intent" and satoshi's initial assumed intent (since we can't exactly ask satoshi for clarification). It's not anyone's responsibility to assume satoshi's vision any more now than it was during the fork wars.