Since it's at the governments request to specifically have access to user data it gives them a means to acquire it on their own via unencrypted channels. They could serve up a warrant on a user with zero resistance from Apple. It's weaponization through hyper implementation of surveillance, which i don't seem to understand considering the U.K typically we're more suggestive of user data privacy. So I think it's purpose is to take hostage of Apple because they didn't get what they originally wanted which was probably more money.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.