will a license tag have legal validity?
I love finding random articles on the internet with a random travel photo I took a decade ago. This is the Querty Monument in Yekaterinburg during a Transiberia trip. I knew it existed, but I had to triangulate the site and remove some snow to find it.
This happens because back in the day all my FlickR photos were CC.
Which reminds me we need a tag to set a license for attached images.
I might re-upload that whole archive too on Nostr, but it requires a bit more moderation on my end.
(no idea what the article is about)
https://jsis.washington.edu/news/russia-media-profile-digital-patriotism-nationalist-agenda/
Discussion
I don't see why it's any different from the FlickR website displaying a license. And I'm always to confirm in writing when someone asks.
* always happy
a client could just be hardcoded to make all images cc0 and users could later claim in court they never intended to do that but didn't read the code
That would be a client showing invalid events assuming the whole event including tags is getting signed. Get a new client
Right, a client that signs away your copyright without permission is just malware :-)
A good client should clearly prompt for permission, at least the first time.
Ideally it should also do "AI" face detection and turn the license off, since the people in the picture didn't necessarily give permission.
Woops, i read this wrong and assumed client reading images and displaying a false license, but youre right.
nostr:note1mqwu4ankwrlgyztyvpx92m3h70atv4466x77p0asztmla29lxm0q0znkn9