You might be right.
And I’m sure even if Q was real and was for the good, we will never really find out.
But if that’s your thesis, explain how bitcoin could possibly benefit the manipulators.
You might be right.
And I’m sure even if Q was real and was for the good, we will never really find out.
But if that’s your thesis, explain how bitcoin could possibly benefit the manipulators.
Bitcoin is a clear set of rules and stakeholders incentivized to maintain those rules.
Best, most efficient solutions win. Block space is going to get very expensive.
Right but somebody wrote those rules.
It doesn’t make sense (to me) that any bad actors would come up with an idea like bitcoin. I see zero benefit to the centralized parties.
It literally aims to destroy them.
That’s why I believe it was invented by the good guys within a certain agency.
It certainly has the propensity to restore truth to the human energy economy.
Always thought Satoshi was Aaron Swartz.
1. He was passionate about inyernet freedom
2. Incredibly adept at floating into existing projects run by older folks and adding synergistic value
3. Was not motivated by money
4. Had the integrity to walk away
Great film: The Internet's Own Boy - Wikipedia