Replying to Avatar David A. Harding

What auditability? I thought nostr:nprofile1qqs9pk20ctv9srrg9vr354p03v0rrgsqkpggh2u45va77zz4mu5p6ccpzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnzv9hxgtcpz4mhxue69uhkummnw3ezummcw3ezuer9wchsz9thwden5te0wfjkccte9ejxzmt4wvhxjme0907cz8 was talking about eliminating miner identity, which prevents eviction of misbehaving miners.

I'm all for anon mining, but pools that allow it now put themselves at risk of block withholding.

I mean the proof of liabilities schema. Publishing all "burned" ecash so clients can validate against it.

Account based eCash or eHash is still private. You know how much you've issued to a specific account but have no way of know when that issuance comes back or who is holding it.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

That seems like it could be compatible with banning withholders. Thanks!