Simplex is not p2p, therefore it works.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚

How do you really feel about dhts?

They're a very cool hack that only works during development and demo presentations.

Sent from my Keet

for direct messages, what about the idea of embedding an encrypted message within an encrypted message (wrap the message) with a new unique pubkey generated for each new chat. The message within the message would then have the verified author and comments.

Kieran talked about this idea on the 11th hour of Frog Talk 24 hour podcast at the 36:30 mark

"there are other ways by kind of wrapping, doing it in layers...you create one event and it has some info in it but it is encrypted and then everything after that will be anonymized using different keys...where you are not actually using your real pubkey but another key that was generated just for that chat."

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/eleventh-hour-of-the-24hr-frog-talk-ft-kieran/id1686753877?i=1000612002735

Should I be ashamed to ask, what is a dhts?

a sex hormone

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dihydrotestosterone

๐Ÿ˜‚

and a distributed hash table, but mostly a sex hormone

๐Ÿ˜‚ aka the pronoun protocol

h/tโ€ฆ there was only one zap Damus would allow me to make

Distributed Hash Tables?

Iโ€™m guessing it would need to be hacked about with to get a messaging system

No doubt thatโ€™s a mere weekend job for you ser ๐Ÿ˜‰

So for privacy e2e > p2p

On plebeian.market I guess weโ€™d conduct most the business on nostr then as soon as thereโ€˜s a need to protect privacy we switch to connect the buyer/seller onto simplex

Itโ€™d have to be seemless

Good challenge