Without shitcoins we wouldn't have evidence for how much better Bitcoin is.
Discussion
I guess. We need something to compare against.
We need data to compare. The block size wars were great because it gave users data and a real choice to make, instead of just speculation on a dreamy version of the alternative.
Here's how I compare. With Bitcoin I'm hungry, with dollars I eat.
It sounds like you're not hunting in the right forest ๐
In my 28 year professional career so far I've had 17 commercial and 5 non-commercial jobs in 10 cities in 5 countries. If there is such a forest it's hiding well.
You need to hunt where he is hunting. nostr:nevent1qqs0wm2xptc5zqflg0cchdh2efkqhsvyzzssrc2fm4v7gp89cjmr09cpzdmhxue69uhk7enxvd5xz6tw9ec82c30qgs2n79n72kpnnqx65v5m5dvjv2dgaq6p9mhg3ycv4feymv3v5vpv3crqsqqqqqpsyzjf7
ยข1000 is fiat money? They convert your Bitcoin to fiat with every purchase for your convenience, but the food is priced in fiat? As such the price in Bitcoin would be fluctuating wildly?
If I wanted to hold Bitcoin prices would have to be somewhat stable otherwise I can't plan ahead financially.
Stupid also that this "jungle" doesn't really have much of an economy (in any currency) and jobs but I guess that could sort itself out if you had a viable scheme there. Every city in the world started from nothing.
