Are you implying that they are refusing to participate in the development of specs for an opened standard for LSPs ?
Honestly the CEO explained on nostr:npub1qny3tkh0acurzla8x3zy4nhrjz5zd8l9sy9jys09umwng00manysew95gx's podcast why they didn't want to let users use another LSP and it was well explained and maked much sense.
But I think they should nevertheless stay opened to the idea of an easy switching tool based on these LSP specs, in case they are shutdown or forced to KYC for some reason etc...
Basically a "danger zone" feature based on these LSPs specs to migrate the channel over a new LSP for extreme situation like this on for example.