🏦 CBDCs: fast digital money or too much control?

Here’s the short version: central banks around the world are testing “CBDCs,” which are government-backed digital dollars. The pitch is that payments would be super fast, super cheap, and even programmable—like money that can follow rules. That sounds handy for things like instant refunds or targeted aid after a disaster.

But think it through. If money is programmable, someone writes the program. That could mean blacklists (you can’t spend on X), expiry dates (money that “goes bad” if you don’t use it), or nudges that try to steer your choices. Add private tech partners who run parts of the system, and you might also get more data collection—who bought what, when, and where—because that’s their business model.

Big question for you: does “programmable” start as a helpful feature and slowly turn into control—rules that shape your life without you getting a vote?

If that worries you, here’s a simple plan. 1) Keep options. Use cash for sensitive purchases where legal; it’s private and works offline. Learn a self-custody crypto wallet (you hold the keys), and practice with tiny amounts so you don’t panic later. 2) Audit your wallet apps. Turn off unnecessary permissions and analytics. If an app wants location or contacts for no good reason, deny it. 3) Support privacy-first payment standards—things that let you pay offline, reveal less data, and don’t tie every purchase to a single ID. 4) Speak up. Oppose any rule that forces one payment method for everything. Mandates remove choice. Ask for “sunset clauses” on emergency powers so temporary rules don’t become permanent. 5) Help your crew learn the basics: how to back up a seed phrase on paper, why you never share it, and how to do a small test transaction.

Fast, fair payments are great. But speed shouldn’t cost you your freedom. Learn, prepare, and keep your choices open.

https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1620311629847-1f54c148a1cc

#grownostr #news #CBDC #Bitcoin #Freedom

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.