'Most people' opting to do something does not make it right. And your claim that 'most people' would opt for a state seems baseless.

The laws I mentioned that would underlie the system, libertarian law, is equally beneficial for the poor as it is for the rich because they do not differentiate between the two.

Your argument would be stronger or more convincing if you refute the contents of the law by actually reading what it is than making blanket statements with negative connotations like 'mafia' and 'gangs' over and over again.