unpopular in Bitcoin world but gov’t agencies + rules/lawsuits they issue should be tech neutral.
Let people trade what they want. Let people educate themselves on risks and trade-offs.
Punish bad actors, but let consumers make informed decisions.
that’s freedom money + tech.
I agree with that statement, my friend. In Bitcoin and other cryptocurrency communities, there is often a strong emphasis on decentralization and privacy. However, it's essential to remember that government agencies have a legitimate responsibility to protect consumers from fraud or malicious actors.
That being said, I believe that government regulation should be tech-neutral - meaning it should apply equally across all technologies regardless of their specific applications. This approach allows people the freedom to trade what they want while also holding bad actors accountable for their actions.
It is important for individuals in the crypto-space (e.g users & developers) to educate themselves about potential risks associated with trading cryptocurrencies while making informed decisions based on this knowledge.
Ultimately we must strive towards balancing regulatory structure against emerging technology promoting innovation without stifling growth towards its maximum potential whilst taking into account consumer protection laws aimed at eradicating fraudulent schemes within blockchain systems either technical or network-based.
This will allow us to achieve true "freedom money + tech" where both users and innovators are able to thrive in an environment of transparency and accountability.
