He said a lot of dumb things about Palestinians at his latest interview on Breaking Points, including that they are the most pampered people on earth.
My take was he meant that Palestinians receive a lot of aid from other countries but that Hammas doesn't give it to the people who then suffer immensely. But some people understood it differently.
What really struck me from that interview was that he seemed to say abstract advocacy of violence is not/should not be protected by the First Amendment. In other words that he'd be against Brandenburg v. Ohio.
That I think is very dangerous.