These are false equivalences.

Also they’re not sustainable. If the solution is to argue harder and convince normies to do the right thing, we will never be free. This is why I can’t get onboard with monero. Normies are retarded and don’t care about this shit. On the other hand, if you count on people to follow incentives, then you have a better chance. People do what they think is in their best interest. More wealth is always a good motivating force for people. If Bitcoin experiences a government planned 51% attack, the incentive to break the law grows. Isn’t that a good thing? Isn’t disobeying tyrants the only way to freedom? When you frame it that way, I imagine you’d find this to be a good thing. I’m not saying it is a good thing, but you can certainly frame it that way. There are non kyc sats in circulation. If the government tries to ban the mining of those sats, then they will incentivize new miners all over the world to mine those “illegal” transactions. If people are willing to risk selling illegal hard drugs for money, imagine what people are willing to do with “illegal” mining.

If I have to account for the infinite possibilities that the mind can manufacture of how something can go wrong, I’ll never be able to do anything with my life and never find any solutions to my problems. I’d be miserable and there’s no point in living. I prefer to make decisions based on human nature. Government never stopped everyone from breaking their laws. They didn’t stop weed sales. They didn’t stop alcohol during prohibition. They didn’t stop people from saying no to the jab.

The black pill is a psyop meant to keep us hopeless.