Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴇᴀᴛʜ ᴏꜰ ᴍʟᴇᴋᴜ

i can't believe you don't get it

the URL format is fine, good

but the semantics of user@example.com is entirely dependent on the protocol, and it's two pieces, the router, and the server

how does the username relate to the nip-05 json and the - optionally - npub (the name is unique anyway) just define a mapping, and nobody screws it up

if you are gonna leave that thing open you are inviting trouble

but idk what to say

i ported a C implementation of the hamming code and i had a lot of trouble imputing the ACTUAL type that was being used by the compiler so that my code produced the same result, in Go, you don't implicit type casting, it has to be explicit

this is exactly the same kind of mental model issue you are demonstrating, typical C programmer, you have some mapping in your mind, but you won't say it

if you don't, have fun supporting irritated devs using more strict typed languages, you thought this evening was fun, hahaha i'm done, gonna sign off on this

Avatar
DanConwayDev 1y ago

I totally misunderstood the premise of this conversation. I think what you are saying is that nip05 is poorly consteucted and your making a mistake by using it. I though you need help understanding nip05 and how it fits into the nostr git URL scheme update. That supirsed me given the knowledge you have displayed elsewhere on nostr. Sorry for the confusion there.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.