Nostr Web Client

Plenty of people talk against vaccines and don't get banned. You problem is that you want to spread dangerous misinformation about vaccines. It's not like you want to have a fact-based discussion about vaccines, you just want to scream nonsense about them and convince people not to get vaccinated.

I don't have to worry about being banned because I'm not a lunatic, that's what it comes down to. So if you feel you are so incapable of self-restraint that you can only hang out on a platform that allows Nazis and pedos, then by all means do so. Just don't cry when it fails to reach broad appeal and the apps get purged from all the stores.

Well I was here to see if there was any merit to the system but now I'm here to laugh at how deluded some of you guys are. The second I said a single thing that did adhere to your cultish beliefs you guys started foaming at the mouth and complaining about me being here. Kinda highlights how weak your position is.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Shllomo N 2y ago

Shadow Ban. When searching for vaccines anywhere, all voices were silent. For two years people were banned, either with their accounts cancelled, whether they were cancelled, or via shadow ban. Interestingly, now they are back to allowing research and talking about the subject. Don't act like you don't understand. Social networks manipulate the content that appears according to the current agenda. And only an idiot can think it's healthy that the power to ban, cancel, and silence people is centralized in the hands of a few.

Del Bigtree had all his social networks removed. All of his content on Twitter, Facebook and YouTube was removed. Now that the idiots have drained the poison from his body, he appears again, but his channel remains cancelled.

PsychoVagabondX 2y ago

That's definitely not true though. I saw loads of vaccine misinformation and loads of people complaining abut vaccines throughout the pandemic. People that were banned were the people going way beyond the limits and creating dangerous situations.

I do understand completely, you inventing a scenario that didn't happen based on your persecution complex so you can makes yourself feel justified in supporting a platform that allows pedophiles to trade abuse images and even monetize them.

Yes, he had his social networks removed because he was spreading dangerous misinformation that was resulting in people trusting fake health information and making health choices that killed them based on it. In my view I wouldn't just silence people spreading dangerous antivax information, I'd hold them liable for every single death that resulted from it.

I love how you think you're going to change my mind by complaining that you don't feel it was fair that you weren't allowed to convinced people to kill themselves based on fake information.